Platform comparison

Maze vs Useberry: Which is right for research with your users?

Maze is a Useberry alternative that helps scale continuous product research across your entire company.

A tale of two platforms

Investing in research with your users fuels high adoption, activation, and retention. Put simply, it enables you to ship a better product to your users, and more frequently. That said, a lot of the impact research creates is influenced by the platform you choose.

Maze and Useberry are two of the leading platforms in the market, but which is the better choice for your organization?

Maze empowers everyone in product teams to continuously collect user insights at an expert-level. It enables testing anything from prototypes to ideas, and allows you to round up valuable user feedback to help deliver truly customer-centric products—all in one place.

Useberry enables UI/UX pioneers and agile product teams to gather user feedback and rich, actionable insights in a matter of minutes.

Let's take a closer look at both.

Maze vs Useberry: Overview


Main applications


G2 Rating

Available on

Main applications


Participant pool Card sorting Heatmaps and design metrics Online surveys

Free to start Growth Plan from $67/month Custom Enterprise plans available

4.5 out of 3 reviews


Participant pool Card sorting Heatmaps and design metrics Online surveys


Prototype testing Usability testing Participant management

Free plan available Starter Plan from $99/month Custom plans for larger organizations

4.5/5 out of 90+ reviews


Prototype testing Usability testing Participant management

Maze vs Useberry: Main differences

What really sets Maze and Useberry apart for teams doing research?

Prototype testing

Discover more options for your prototype tests in Maze, including multiple ways to get from the start to finish screen, and powerful design integrations to import your prototypes from.

Reporting functionalities

Maze Reports are visually rich, automated, and fully customizable. Filter and categorize information in detail to uncover patterns and share valuable insights with stakeholders.

Tester management

Sourcing and recruiting test participants is both easier and cheaper with Maze. You can choose from two options: panel recruiting, or creating your very own participant database.

Maze vs Useberry: Feature comparison





Deep integrations with design tools

Adobe XD, Figma, InVision, Sketch

Adobe XD, Figma, InVision, Sketch, Protopie

Adobe XD, Figma, InVision, Sketch

Prototype testing

Video / screen session recording

Tester panel


Tree testing

Live website testing

In-product surveys


Card sorting

5-Second testing

Moderated interview analysis

Tester management database

Conditional logic

For product research from A-Z, choose Maze

Whether you’re just getting started or looking to scale your research, Maze will lead you towards always delivering a truly user-centric product.

Why product and design teams are making the switch to Maze

Intuitive experience

It’s hard enough to source test participants—you don’t want any more friction to get research campaigns completed. Maze is an easy-to-use platform whose tests can be carried out on any device.

Insightful, custom prototype tests

Validate usability across your prototypes with real users in multiple ways before building and investing valuable resources.

Works with:

Adobe XD

Flexible tester management

Source participants from Maze's diverse recruitment panel, powered by Prolific. Or, send targeted research campaigns to specific Amplitude cohorts and your very own tailored participant database, achieving 4x the market average response rate.

Research autonomously, learn together

Data insights are only as valuable as they are understandable. Maze's reports are automated, visually rich, and fully customizable. Plus, you can easily embed them in your favorite tools.

Scaleable research practice

Ultimately, Maze saves time and budget collecting data without compromising quality. Empower your product team with actionable insights and deliver value to your customers more often.

Maze vs Useberry: Takeaways

Both Maze and Useberry are strong contenders for conducting product research with your end users. At the end of the day it comes down to which platform aligns better your workflow and your vision as a team.

Maze is a better fit for those who want to inform everyday decisions, such as validating concepts and de-risking designs and prototypes early on. It also has superior collaboration features, which enables a mindset continuous discovery in your team while delivering value to your customers.

No more dead ends in research—bring a customer-focused mindset to your organization

Frequently asked questions

Who is Maze for?

Anyone working in a product team should be empowered to do research—whether you’re a designer, researcher, product manager, or other.

Maze is used by teams that want to empower everyone to collect actionable user insights to make informed decisions, and share learnings across their whole organization.

What kind of teams use Maze?

Maze is used by product, design and research teams that want actionable user insights to make informed decisions with their users, for their users.

Teams from all sizes and industries use Maze, including Financial Services, Travel, Insurance, Technology/Software, Healthcare, and Retail.

What’s continuous discovery and why does it benefit my company?

Continuous product research fuels high adoption, activation, and retention—simply put, it enables you to ship more value to your users, and more frequently. Maze empowers anyone who does research to autonomously run expert-level, unmoderated research—facilitating a discovery mindset in product teams so you can build the right product, with your users, for your users.

Can I request a demo?

Absolutely! Tell us a little about your company here and we’ll connect you with someone in our team.

Do you have comparisons with other platforms?

Yes. Read on to discover all comparisons of Maze with other platforms.