Comparing research platforms
Maze vs Dovetail: Choosing the Right Platform for Product Research
From prototype testing to AI insights, see how Maze and Dovetail compare in helping teams collect, analyze, and share research at speed.

Maze vs. Dovetail: Introduction
Choosing the right user research platform is key to turning feedback into actionable insights. Maze and Dovetail are two well-known platforms, but they serve different purposes within the research process.
Dovetail is a research repository and data analysis tool, not a platform for running research. You can’t conduct usability tests, prototype tests, interviews, card sorts, or any live studies inside Dovetail. All data must be imported from external usability testing tools for Dovetail to tag, organize, and analyze using AI.
Maze is an end-to-end user research platform that enables both moderated and unmoderated studies, including Interview Studies, Feedback Studies, Prototype Testing, and more. With Maze’s AI capabilities, teams can automate interviews, generate follow-up questions, summarize findings, and uncover key themes faster. Mobile testing through Maze Participate, AI-driven prototyping integrations with Figma Make, Bolt, and Loveable, and participant management make it a complete, scalable solution for modern research workflows.
In this detailed comparison, we explore how Maze and Dovetail compare in:
- User-friendliness and ease of use: Which platform is easier to onboard and scale across your team?
- Versatility and functionality: Does it support live testing, AI-powered analysis, and integrations across your design and data tools?
- Product decision-making: How quickly can you collect, analyze, and share insights to move projects forward?
Let’s see which platform meets your needs.
Maze vs. Dovetail comparison (from G2 user reviews)
Maze | Dovetail | |
|---|---|---|
Overall rating (G2) | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 /5 |
Ease of setup | 9.0 / 10 | 8.7 / 10 |
Ease of use | 9.4 / 10 | 8.6 / 10 |
Integrations |
|
|
Pricing |
|
|
Maze vs. Dovetail: Main differences
What really sets Maze and Dovetail apart for teams doing research?

End-to-end research execution
Dovetail pulls insights from customer feedback, interviews, and support conversations to create a searchable, AI-powered repository. However, it doesn’t natively support usability testing or live studies. It’s for analysis, not research. Maze enables teams to conduct both qualitative and quantitative research, including moderated and unmoderated approaches such as prototype testing, live website testing, card sorting, and tree testing.

Automated, shareable reporting
Dovetail provides strong tagging and synthesis of customer insights, but creating shareable reports still requires manual setup. Teams must export insights into other tools. Maze Reports are generated following any study with metrics like completion rate, time on task, and path analysis with AI-powered sentiment and theme summaries. Reports are fully customizable and shareable.

Integrations across design and data tools
Dovetail connects widely across CRM, support, and productivity stacks like Salesforce, Intercom, HubSpot, and Zapier, which suits insight storage and cross-team documentation. Maze integrates with product and design tools like Figma, Figma Make, FigJam, Bolt, Loveable, Miro, Amplitude, and Atlassian products. Maze also connects with collaboration tools like Slack, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Notion. Together, these integrations plug Maze directly into the design, testing, and analysis workflow.
Maze vs. Dovetail: Feature comparison
Features
Dovetail
Maze
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bolt, Figma Make, Loveable, Replit
—
Bolt, Figma Make, Loveable, Replit
Atlassian, FigJam, Miro, Notion, Slack
Atlassian, FigJam, Miro, Notion, Slack
—
—
—
—