Research platform comparison

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Which is right for research with your users?

Maze is a Optimal Workshop alternative that helps companies build the right products faster by making user insights available at the speed of product development.

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Which is right for research with your users?

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Introduction

When it comes to research with your users, choosing the right platform can make all the difference to your team. Optimal Workshop and Maze are two popular research platforms in the market, but which is the better choice for your organization?

Optimal Workshop helps organizations build more intuitive and successful digital experiences through a UX research suite of tools focused heavily on information architecture tasks like card sorting and tree testing.

Maze is an AI-first end-to-end platform enabling collection of both qualitative and quantitative insights at an expert-level allowing you to make more confident decisions at the pace of product development. It auto generates reports, analysis and themes allowing you to collect and share insights faster.

In this detailed comparison, we’re covering how both these platforms compare to each other in key points such as:

  • User-friendliness - How easy will this platform be to onboard with my team or organization? Will this help democratize our user research?
  • Versatility - Is this a true end-to-end platform? Does it facilitate both quantitative and qualitative research methods? How well does this platform integrate with the design tools we use?
  • Product decision making - How easily and quickly can we analyze results and customize insight reports to make important decisions?

Platform comparison (from G2 user reviews)

Maze

Optimal Workshop

Overall rating (G2)

4.5/5 out of 90+ reviews

4.5/5 out of 10+ reviews

Ease of setup

9.6 / 10

n/a

Product direction

8.4 / 10

7.7 / 10

Pricing

  • Free to start
  • Pro Plan from $208/month
  • Team Plan from $191/user/month
  • Custom Enterprise plans

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Main differences

What really sets Maze and Optimal Workshop apart for teams doing research?

One tool vs many

One tool vs many

Unlike Optimal Workshop, which requires using different tools for each task, Maze offers a comprehensive user testing in a single platform, which makes it easier to manage and share insights.

Breadth of research methods

Breadth of research methods

Maze offers a wider range of research tasks than Optimal Workshop, including prototype testing and moderated interviews, providing real user experience insights crucial to refine your design or product.

Research democratization

Research democratization

Maze is an enterprise-ready, user-friendly platform, enabling every designer, product team, and researcher company-wide to make product decisions based on user insights.

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Feature comparison

Features

Maze

Optimal Workshop

Maze

Tester panel

Participant management database

Surveys

Tree testing

Heatmaps

Card sorting

First-click testing

Video / screen session recording

Prototype testing

Integrations with design tools

Adobe XD, Axure, Figma, Sketch

Adobe XD, Axure, Figma, Sketch

Integrations with productivity tools

Amplitude, Atlassian, Dovetail, Miro, Notion, Slack

Amplitude, Atlassian, Dovetail, Miro, Notion, Slack

In-product surveys

Live website testing

Conditional/branching logic

Automated themes (AI)

Sentiment analysis (AI)

Automated interview analysis

Moderated interviews

Coming soon

Coming soon

Maze vs Optimal Workshop: Takeaways

At the end of the day, it comes down to which platform aligns better not only with your budget, but also with your workflow and vision as a team.

Optimal Workshop focuses on extracting detailed insights from information architecture research like advanced card sorts.

On the other hand, Maze is an intuitive, cost-effective choice for teams who need a blend of qualitative and quantitative research to inform everyday product decisions. With AI-powered tools for both moderated and unmoderated studies integrated within the same platform, Maze is a more affordable option if you're hiring from a panel, has superior prototype features and integrations and overall gives product teams a scalable way to uncover user insights at speed.

UX Reporting Metrics and Insights

Adopt a customer-centric mindset with Maze

Save time and budget with Maze, a comprehensive, cost-effective solution to user research. Get the full picture with both detailed quantitative metrics and AI-powered qualitative insights and deliver value to your customers more often.

Why product and design teams are making the switch to Maze

Run research on live flows and experiences

Live website testing

Run research on live flows and experiences

Maze offers a wider range of research tasks for everyday use, including Website Testing, providing real user experience insights which are crucial for refining your design or product.

Robust, customizable reporting

Robust, customizable reporting

Maze's reports are automated, visually-rich, and fully customizable. Filter and categorize information in detail to uncover patterns and share valuable insights with stakeholders.

Prototype testing, done right

Prototype testing, done right

Integrate with leading design tools and validate usability across your prototypes with real users, from click tracking to multiple user path goals. All before investing valuable resources.

Works with:

Figma Integration
Sketch
Adobe XD
Automated Interview Summary with AI - Maze

Maze AI

Embrace the future of user research

Elevate your company's product research with innovative, AI-powered capabilities that enable you to collect more insights, faster, and with more precision than ever before.

Frequently asked questions

Why choose Maze over Optimal Workshop for user research?

Product managers, designers, and researchers pick Maze over Optimal Workshop for several reasons:

  1. Maze is more intuitive & user-friendly. It allows for easy rollout and adoption at all levels - even some more complex functionalities like testing design prototypes is more straightforward.
  2. Maze is a truly all-in-one research platform. It balanced quantitative and qualitative insights better by incorporating quantitative (time on task, completion/abandonment/error/etc rates) and behavioral usability data (clickstreams and heatmaps).
  3. Maze has a more robust reporting. Maze's reports are automated, visually-rich, and fully customizable. One can filter and categorize information in detail to uncover patterns and share valuable insights with stakeholders.

How can I start using Maze?

Feel free to signup for a free account at Maze to play around with the platform. If you still have questions about how Maze works or how it can help your organization, get in touch with our product experts.

Who is Maze for?

Anyone working in a product team should be empowered to do research—whether you’re a designer, researcher, product manager, or other.

Maze is used by teams that want to empower everyone to collect actionable user insights to make informed decisions, and share learnings across their whole organization.

What kind of teams use Maze?

Maze is used by product, design and research teams that want actionable user insights to make informed decisions with their users, for their users.

Teams from all sizes and industries use Maze, including Financial Services, Travel, Insurance, Technology/Software, Healthcare, and Retail.

Does Maze use AI?

Maze has a breadth of AI-powered functionalities designed to elevate your product research and enabling you to collect more insights, faster, and with more precision than ever before.

Can I request a demo?

Absolutely! Tell us a little about your company here and we’ll connect you with someone in our team.

Bring a customer-focused mindset to your organization

Maze gives product teams a scalable way to uncover user insights at speed and feed them across the entire product development cycle.